当我用酶测试类组件时,我可以wrapper.setState({})
设置状态。当我使用useState()
钩子测试功能组件时,我现在该怎么做?
例如在我的组件中,我有:
const [mode, setMode] = useState("my value");
我想mode
在我的测试中改变
当我用酶测试类组件时,我可以wrapper.setState({})
设置状态。当我使用useState()
钩子测试功能组件时,我现在该怎么做?
例如在我的组件中,我有:
const [mode, setMode] = useState("my value");
我想mode
在我的测试中改变
使用钩子中的状态时,您的测试必须忽略状态等实现细节才能正确测试它。您仍然可以确保组件将正确的状态传递给其子组件。
您可以在Kent C. Dodds 撰写的这篇博文中找到一个很好的示例。
这是它的摘录和代码示例。
依赖于状态实现细节的测试 -
test('setOpenIndex sets the open index state properly', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<Accordion items={[]} />)
expect(wrapper.state('openIndex')).toBe(0)
wrapper.instance().setOpenIndex(1)
expect(wrapper.state('openIndex')).toBe(1)
})
不依赖状态实现细节的测试 -
test('counter increments the count', () => {
const {container} = render(<Counter />)
const button = container.firstChild
expect(button.textContent).toBe('0')
fireEvent.click(button)
expect(button.textContent).toBe('1')
})
这是我发现的方法,我不是说这是对还是错。就我而言,代码块依赖于设置为特定值的状态。我会保留我对 React 测试的看法。
在您的测试文件中:调整react库的导入
import * as React from 'react'
然后在你的测试中监视 useState 并模拟它的实现
const stateSetter = jest.fn()
jest
.spyOn(React, 'useState')
//Simulate that mode state value was set to 'new mode value'
.mockImplementation(stateValue => [stateValue='new mode value', stateSetter])
请注意,这种模拟 useState 将适用于为您的测试调用 useState 的所有实例,因此如果您正在查看多个状态值,它们都将被设置为“新模式值”。其他人可能会帮你解决这个问题。希望能帮助到你。
在测试文件的顶部,可以首先定义为:
import { useState } from 'react';
jest.mock('react', () => ({
...jest.requireActual('react'),
useState: jest.fn()
}));
const useStateMock: jest.Mock<typeof useState> = useState as never;
之后,在每个测试中都可以使用不同的值来测试:
const setValue = jest.fn();
useStateMock
.mockImplementation(() => ['value', setValue]);
你应该用这种方式
// setupTests.js
const { configure } = require('enzyme')
const Adapter = require('@wojtekmaj/enzyme-adapter-react-17')
const { createSerializer } = require('enzyme-to-json')
configure({ adapter: new Adapter() });
expect.addSnapshotSerializer(createSerializer({
ignoreDefaultProps: true,
mode: 'deep',
noKey: true,
}));
import React, { useState } from "react";
const Home = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<section>
<h3>{count}</h3>
<span>
<button id="count-up" type="button" onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Count Up</button>
<button id="count-down" type="button" onClick={() => setCount(count - 1)}>Count Down</button>
<button id="zero-count" type="button" onClick={() => setCount(0)}>Zero</button>
</span>
</section>
);
}
export default Home;
// index.test.js
import { mount } from 'enzyme';
import Home from '../';
import React, { useState as useStateMock } from 'react';
jest.mock('react', () => ({
...jest.requireActual('react'),
useState: jest.fn(),
}));
describe('<Home />', () => {
let wrapper;
const setState = jest.fn();
beforeEach(() => {
useStateMock.mockImplementation(init => [init, setState]);
wrapper = mount(<Home />);
});
afterEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
describe('Count Up', () => {
it('calls setCount with count + 1', () => {
wrapper.find('#count-up').simulate('click');
expect(setState).toHaveBeenCalledWith(1);
});
});
describe('Count Down', () => {
it('calls setCount with count - 1', () => {
wrapper.find('#count-down').props().onClick();
expect(setState).toHaveBeenCalledWith(-1);
});
});
describe('Zero', () => {
it('calls setCount with 0', () => {
wrapper.find('#zero-count').props().onClick();
expect(setState).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0);
});
});
});