我试图了解地址系列 vpnv4 和地址系列 ipv4 vrf 之间的区别
因此,为了测试场景,我将 2 个路由器(R1 和 R2)线性背靠背连接。R1 的环回为 11.11.11.11
R2 的环回地址为 22.22.22.22
在 R2 上,我有 vrf TEST22。在 R2 上,我还有一条到 vrf TEST22 中网络 100.0.0.0 的静态路由,如下所示
ip route vrf TEST22 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 null 0
我希望在 R1 上学习这条路线。
在 R1 上,我有 vrf TEST11。
R1 上的配置和命令输出:
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
BGP router identifier 11.11.11.11, local AS number 1
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 17 16 1 0 0 00:03:18 0
R1#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R1(config)#ip vrf TEST11
R1(config-vrf)#route
R1(config-vrf)#route-target im
R1(config-vrf)#route-target import 2:2
R1(config-vrf)#end
R1#
*Mar 1 00:20:32.703: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
BGP router identifier 11.11.11.11, local AS number 1
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 19 18 1 0 0 00:04:04 0
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
BGP router identifier 11.11.11.11, local AS number 1
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 19 18 1 0 0 00:04:06 0
R1#
R1#sho run | sec vrf
ip vrf TEST11
rd 1:1
route-target import 2:2
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST11
no synchronization
R1#
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
BGP router identifier 11.11.11.11, local AS number 1
BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3
2 network entries using 280 bytes of memory
2 path entries using 136 bytes of memory
2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 248 bytes of memory
1 BGP AS-PATH entries using 24 bytes of memory
1 BGP extended community entries using 24 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
BGP using 712 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 2/0 prefixes, 2/0 paths, scan interval 15 secs
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 20 18 3 0 0 00:04:42 1
R1#
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST11
BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 11.11.11.11
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 1:1 (default for vrf TEST11)
*> 100.0.0.0 22.22.22.22 100 0 2 ?
R1#E{M'}T
R1#p}
R1#
R1#
R1#ter len 0
R1#sho run | sec bgp
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 22.22.22.22 remote-as 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 22.22.22.22 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 22.22.22.22 activate
neighbor 22.22.22.22 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST11
no synchronization
exit-address-family
R1#
R1#
R1#sho run | sec vrf
ip vrf TEST11
rd 1:1
route-target import 2:2
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST11
no synchronization
R1#
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp sum
R1#sho ip bgp summary
BGP router identifier 11.11.11.11, local AS number 1
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 27 25 1 0 0 00:11:06 0
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST11 summary
R1#
R1#sho ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
C 1.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
S 22.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 11.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback0
R1#
R1#sho ip route vr
R1#sho ip route vrf TEST11
Routing Table: TEST11
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
B 100.0.0.0/8 [20/100] via 22.22.22.22, 00:07:57
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpn
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vr
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST11
BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 11.11.11.11
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 1:1 (default for vrf TEST11)
*> 100.0.0.0 22.22.22.22 100 0 2 ?
R1#
R2上的配置和命令输出:
R2#
R2#
R2#sho run | sec router bgp
router bgp 2
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 11.11.11.11 remote-as 1
neighbor 11.11.11.11 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 11.11.11.11 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 11.11.11.11 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 11.11.11.11 activate
neighbor 11.11.11.11 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST22
redistribute static metric 100
no synchronization
exit-address-family
R2#
R2#
R2#sho ip bgp summ
R2#sho ip bgp summary
BGP router identifier 1.1.1.2, local AS number 2
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
11.11.11.11 4 1 68 70 1 0 0 00:54:37 0
R2#
R2#
R2#sho ip bgp vpn
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vr
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST22
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 1.1.1.2
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 2:2 (default for vrf TEST22)
*> 100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 100 32768 ?
R2#
R2#
R2#sho run | sec vrf
ip vrf TEST22
rd 2:2
route-target export 2:2
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST22
redistribute static metric 100
no synchronization
ip route vrf TEST22 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0
R2#
R2#sho ip bgp vpn
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 al
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summ
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
BGP router identifier 1.1.1.2, local AS number 2
BGP table version is 4, main routing table version 4
1 network entries using 140 bytes of memory
1 path entries using 68 bytes of memory
2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 248 bytes of memory
1 BGP extended community entries using 24 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
Bitfield cache entries: current 1 (at peak 1) using 32 bytes of memory
BGP using 512 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 1/0 prefixes, 1/0 paths, scan interval 15 secs
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
11.11.11.11 4 1 71 73 4 0 0 00:57:28 0
R2#
R2#
R2#
Q1:如您所见,R1 在 vrf TEST11 中学习了路由 100.0.0.0。即使我没有在 下激活邻居,但 R1 仍然学习了该路由。如何?是 作为该路线的运输承运人吗?1.1.1.1
address-family ipv4 vrf <vrf name>
address-family vpnv4
Q2:在另一种情况下,我从 R1 和 R2 上的 vpnv4 地址系列中删除了邻居,如下所示
在 R1 上
R1#sho run | sec router bgp
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 22.22.22.22 remote-as 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 22.22.22.22 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST22
neighbor 22.22.22.22 remote-as 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 22.22.22.22 activate
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST11
no synchronization
exit-address-family
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST22 summary | b Neighbor
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 never Active
R1#
R1#sho run | sec vrf
ip vrf TEST11
rd 1:1
route-target import 2:2
ip vrf TEST22
rd 1:2
route-target import 2:2
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST22
neighbor 22.22.22.22 remote-as 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 22.22.22.22 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 22.22.22.22 activate
no synchronization
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST11
no synchronization
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST22 summary | b Neighbor
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
22.22.22.22 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 never Active
R1#
R1#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST22
R1#
在 R2 上:
R2#sho run | sec bgp
router bgp 2
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 11.11.11.11 remote-as 1
neighbor 11.11.11.11 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 11.11.11.11 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor 11.11.11.11 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf TEST22
redistribute static metric 10
neighbor 11.11.11.11 remote-as 1
neighbor 11.11.11.11 ebgp-multihop 2
neighbor 11.11.11.11 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 11.11.11.11 activate
no synchronization
exit-address-family
R2#
R2#sho run | i null
R2#sho run | i route
ip route 11.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/0
ip route vrf TEST22 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0
R2#
R2#
R2#sho ip bgp vpnv4 vrf TEST22 summary | b Neighbor
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
11.11.11.11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active
R2#sho ip bgp summ
R2#sho ip bgp summary | b Neigh
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
11.11.11.11 4 1 203 205 1 0 0 00:01:42 0
R2#
如您所见,在 R1 上,到 100.0.0.0 的路由不再存在。此外,BGP vrf 对等互连处于活动状态。为什么会这样?address-family vpnv4
和之间有什么关系address-family ipv4 vrf <vrf name>
吗?是否必须为address-family vpnv4
要交换的 vrf 路由激活邻居?