For confidence intervals we always use the form p^±zp(1−p)n−−−−−√. For the 95% confidence interval z=1.96
Since the term zp(1−p)n−−−−−√ depends on p there are some proportions which have bigger confidence intervals. The worst case scenario is where p=0.5, this has the most variation which is why the confidence interval is larger.
Before we collect any data we might want to estimate how good the results might be. Since we don't have data for the proportion we can just use the worst case scenario. For the worst case scenario the accuracy indicated by the confidence interval is z0.5(1−0.5)n−−−−−−−√
For the 95% confidence interval where z=1.96 this simplifies to 0.98n√
This is where your idea of 1n√ comes from. The constant in the numerator is 0.98 which is close to 1 but this is only for the 95% confidence interval, other levels of confidence will have other values.
In your questions you have data for every case so you won't need to use the worst case scenario. However, it's still useful to remember for times when you are planning an experiment and you want to see if it is feasible before collecting any data.