我意识到这有点离题，但不知道还能去哪里问......
在过去的 24 小时（数百个）中，我收到了大量的垃圾邮件，即使在一些相对较好的垃圾邮件过滤器之后也是如此。几乎所有这些东西都是骗人的减肥计划，声称是从碧昂丝、帕梅拉安德森等人那里转发的。电子邮件文本多种多样，包含的链接指向许多不同的位置。
这是我的电子邮件地址独有的东西，还是正在发生一般的垃圾邮件“风暴”？（看起来有点像垃圾邮件发送者为了“平衡”最近的一些警务行动而做的那种幼稚的事情。）
我不会假装理解这些东西，但这里有一些来自今天洪水的典型垃圾邮件的标题信息：
Received: from adminteam ([203.123.157.82]) by na3sys009amx187.postini.com ([74.125.148.10]) with SMTP;
Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:47:16 CDT
Received: (qmail 3351 by uid 143); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:48:00 -0530
From: "No risk Katy Perry Free trials" <penelopetheir@cafb29b24.org>
To: <xxxxxxx@ieee.org>
Subject: Fwd: ..
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:19:48 -0530
Message-ID: <005301ce2f1e$7ff59b90$7fe0d2b0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0052_01CE2F1E.7FF59B90"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acjhs69UR3NtbvBhPNkurEv2AtSBlw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.00000/66.47495 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-dkim: 0 skipped:not-enabled
X-pstn-status: off
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN)
X-Spam-Score: 2.00 (**) [Tag at 3.80] HK_NAME_FREE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF(none:0),RBL(rp-grey:1.0)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=203.123.157.82; country=IN; region=25; city=Chennai; latitude=13.0833; longitude=80.2833; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=13.0833,80.2833&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: 06202139 (inherits from 32_HI_TAG-LO_BLOCK,default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: IEEE Spam Scanner (https://uce.ieee.org/) on 140.98.193.228
虽然这里有一些典型的“合法”垃圾邮件（被我的邮件转发器标记）：
From: "The New Yorker" <mailer@mail.realviewtechnologies.com>
To: <xxxxxxx@ieee.org>
Subject: ***[Possible UCE]*** =?utf-8?B?QXByaWwgOCwgMjAxMzogSGVucnkgQmxvZGdldDsgdGhlIHJpc2Ugb2YgVmljZSBNZWRpYTsgY29va2luZyBzaG93czsgYW5kIG1vcmUu?=
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:31:44 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailEnable
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <40efcf1c-741e-4e4e-b0ce-90fd5b422bc3.MAI@mail.realviewtechnologies.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--=_NextPart_01042013103144_006229358"
X-RVID: 101536031
X-pstn-neptune: 28/1/0.04/98
X-pstn-levels: (S:30.17530/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-dkim: 0 skipped:not-enabled
X-pstn-status: off
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.9919 (Score 2.5, tokens from: @@RPTN)
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 4.00 (****) [Tag at 3.80] HTML_MESSAGE,SPF(softfail:0),RBL(rp-mixed:1.5),Bayes(0.9919:2.5)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=210.87.32.100; country=AU; region=07; city=Melbourne; latitude=-37.8139; longitude=144.9634; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=-37.8139,144.9634&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: 06202139 (inherits from 32_HI_TAG-LO_BLOCK,default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: IEEE Spam Scanner (https://uce.ieee.org/) on 140.98.193.228
奇怪的是，第二个的垃圾邮件分数是第一个的两倍，贝叶斯概率（无论是什么）几乎是确定的，而对于第一个情况，它基本上为零。似乎第一个案例成功地避开了垃圾邮件过滤器。
（无论如何，洪水似乎已经停止了。）
